Popularity in Scotland
compared to Leslie
Numbers
| Lesley (feminine) | Leslie (masculine) | |||||
| Year | Rank | Percent Used | Rank | Percent Used | ||
| 2023 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2022 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2021 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2020 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2019 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2018 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2017 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2016 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2015 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2014 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2013 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2012 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2011 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2010 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2009 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2008 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2007 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2006 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2005 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2004 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2003 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2002 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2001 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2000 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1999 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1998 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1997 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1996 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1995 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1994 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1993 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1992 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1991 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1990 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1989 | #83 | 0.271 | - | - | ||
| 1988 | #62 | 0.367 | - | - | ||
| 1987 | #65 | 0.372 | - | - | ||
| 1986 | #55 | 0.420 | - | - | ||
| 1985 | #50 | 0.455 | - | - | ||
| 1984 | #45 | 0.563 | - | - | ||
| 1983 | #41 | 0.586 | - | - | ||
| 1982 | #33 | 0.713 | - | - | ||
| 1981 | #33 | 0.744 | - | - | ||
| 1980 | #35 | 0.744 | - | - | ||
| 1979 | #31 | 0.776 | - | - | ||
| 1978 | #28 | 0.913 | - | - | ||
| 1977 | #29 | 0.894 | - | - | ||
| 1976 | #23 | 1.030 | - | - | ||
| 1975 | #26 | 0.970 | - | - | ||
| 1974 | #24 | 0.996 | - | - | ||
| 1973 | #24 | 1.137 | - | - | ||
| 1972 | #22 | 1.205 | - | - | ||
| 1971 | #18 | 1.309 | #97 | 0.108 | ||
| 1970 | #12 | 1.603 | #95 | 0.107 | ||
| 1969 | #14 | 1.483 | #90 | 0.139 | ||
| 1968 | #10 | 1.741 | #80 | 0.168 | ||
| 1967 | #9 | 1.895 | #74 | 0.202 | ||
| 1966 | #11 | 1.741 | #75 | 0.187 | ||
| 1965 | #19 | 1.343 | #71 | 0.211 | ||
| 1964 | #22 | 1.178 | #69 | 0.203 | ||
| 1963 | #22 | 1.074 | #68 | 0.226 | ||
| 1962 | #20 | 1.280 | #62 | 0.282 | ||
| 1961 | #21 | 1.254 | #59 | 0.293 | ||
| 1960 | #22 | 1.114 | #59 | 0.320 | ||
| 1959 | #22 | 1.076 | #57 | 0.336 | ||
| 1958 | #29 | 0.900 | #56 | 0.345 | ||
| 1957 | #30 | 0.777 | #53 | 0.367 | ||
| 1956 | #36 | 0.660 | #56 | 0.345 | ||
| 1955 | #38 | 0.644 | #51 | 0.370 | ||
| 1954 | #34 | 0.706 | #51 | 0.356 | ||
| 1953 | #44 | 0.561 | #47 | 0.395 | ||
| 1952 | #61 | 0.383 | #56 | 0.305 | ||
| 1951 | #58 | 0.389 | #51 | 0.340 | ||
| 1950 | #68 | 0.324 | #54 | 0.320 | ||
| 1949 | #70 | 0.277 | #51 | 0.327 | ||
| 1948 | #69 | 0.274 | #51 | 0.322 | ||
| 1947 | #78 | 0.243 | #43 | 0.407 | ||
| 1946 | #76 | 0.257 | #48 | 0.384 | ||
| 1945 | #86 | 0.209 | #41 | 0.404 | ||
| 1944 | #94 | 0.179 | #47 | 0.357 | ||
| 1943 | - | - | #47 | 0.326 | ||
| 1942 | - | - | #51 | 0.278 | ||
| 1941 | - | - | #51 | 0.267 | ||
| 1940 | - | - | #49 | 0.260 | ||
| 1939 | - | - | #56 | 0.208 | ||
| 1938 | - | - | #52 | 0.224 | ||
| 1937 | - | - | #53 | 0.231 | ||
| 1936 | - | - | #53 | 0.229 | ||
| 1935 | - | - | #48 | 0.236 | ||
 |
|
|||||