View Message

[Opinions] Darlene
Like, or dislike? Why?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I never found Darlene trashy, but that might be because I have a relative with the name. Sure, it may be a bit dated, but I like lots of dated names. I love Arlene, so Darlene and Marlene are nice, too.Names like Lurline, Brandine, and Earlene are in a different class altogether.
vote up1
Reminiscent of Darling
vote up1
Kitschy, but in a bad way
vote up1
I would like it okay, if it didn't sound so much like "darling." I like the Dar- syllable and the -rl-, but the -lene ending isn't really my thing.It's right in between "dated" and "old lady" to me. Technically I guess it is an old lady name now. When I was growing up, a friend's mother was named Darlene - she'd be about 70 now. So to me Darlene is not "downmarket" or "kitschy" or whatever it might seem like if I had never met anyone with that name. To me it's just a normal name for a middle class white Californian born around the 40s... my friend's mom Darlene was diminutive, softspoken, educated, Catholic, curly-haired, had a tall bearded goofy husband who I think worked as an architect? and wore distinctive small thick spectacles with octagonal wire frames. Sort of a bright nerdy girl type, I guess. So that's my image of Darlene. But if I hadn't ever known one I'd probably think it sounded sort of midwestern-kitschy ... yeah, I can see that. It's that -rlene ending that does it, because it makes me think of Lurlene and Earlene. Another of my childhood friends' moms was called Arlene, and that doesn't seem too kitschy to me either. But Charlene kinda does. Charlene was given as a middle name to my friend's daughter, honoring a grandmother.Darlene is too dated to use, still, IMO. By that I mean it still just sounds conspicuously dated - I don't think it sounds terribly unfashionable, the way Lurlene or Earlene would.
vote up1
I like both, but prefer Darla, and I don't really think Darlene is useable. It's a television-only sort of name for me. My sole association with it is the daughter on Roseanne, and I don't think Darlene or Darla ever made it to Britain, because I've never seen either name in real life. Darla seems much less dated, probably because Charlene etc are very 70's/80's whereas Carla is pretty timeless.
vote up1
Darlene and Darla, which I prefer, number among my guilty pleasures. I like how saccharine and kitschy they are.
vote up1
kitschy...you used the perfect word
vote up1
I dislike it. Darlene feels dated and a little downmarket to me. It might be the combination of that -AR first syllable followed by -leen because I feel the same way about Marlene, Charlene, Carleen, and Harlene, but I really don't mind, say, Eileen, Kathleen, and Colleen.
vote up1
Harlene?!Eeeeewwwwww. Never seen it. Hope I don't. o.OI'm with you. I always liked Eileen, Kathleen, Colleen, Maureen better than -arlene names. I have at some points kind of liked Marlene, but only because Dietrich made it better for me.
vote up1
Ahhhh I just thought about this name a few minutes ago. Can you read minds? Haha I was about to open a thread.I have a soft spot for it but I do think it's a bit trashy. I really want to like it but most of the -lene names have a trashy image mainly created by the media. There are Brandine and Lurlene on The Simpsons, for example. Then there's Darlene on Roseanne. I wouldn't really say she's trashy, I actually like her and think she's smart, but she comes from a family which doesn't have a high income and I think it's not used much by the upper class. Still I think both Darla and Darlene are kind of sweet, I just don't like them enough to use.It also feels a bit dated. I think it was in the top 100 in the 60s or so. I would be quite excited to meet a real life Darlene, though. I knew one who is a teen (Darlene) and a little girl who would now be 14 or so named Darleen and she was a cutie. But I don't know any at the moment.

This message was edited 12/28/2011, 8:53 AM

vote up1