View Message

Pick One
Rosemarie Sophia or Rosemarie SiennaSophia is my younger sister, she's turning 5 at the end of the month. Is she too young to honor? I'm not having kids any time soon, but probably (hopefully) within the next five years or so. All my other PFC combos have family mns, and I do like the name Sophia.Sienna is for meaning. Mine and SO's anniversary is in October. I can't think of anyone else to honor, so I thought it might be sweet to include a reference to me and SO. So Rosemarie Sophia or Rosemarie Sienna, and why?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Rosemarie Sophia, for sure. I'm sure your little sister would love having someone named after her.
vote up1
Rosemarie Sophia. Sienna is jarring next to the classic Rosemarie.
vote up1
Rosemarie Sienna.I keep reading this combo as Rosemary. I guess subconsciously I prefer that!Rosemarie Sienna is a nice combo, though it's NMS. I don't love Sienna, but I think it sounds better than Sophia and agree that 5-10 years old is too young to honor, even though the intention is very, very sweet. I also think it's great that Sienna holds such a significance for you and your SO.If you wanted to try and honor your sister, though, you could try to find another name that means the same thing as Sophia, which is "wisdom" in Greek. I think that could be a subtle way of honoring her without being too in your face about it.http://www.behindthename.com/php/search.php?nmd=mdu&terms=wisdom
vote up1
I absolutely prefer Rosemarie Sophia, which is more classic and sophisticated than Rosemarie Sienna.
vote up1
Definitely Rosemarie Sophia. Not only do I prefer Sophia over Sienna massively but also because it is honouring - all family members can be honoured - no matter their age, imo.:)
vote up1
To be starkly forthright, I don't personally like the middlenames or the firstname.Rosemarie Sophia is my favorite, if I had to choose.
While hearing another Sophia would be profoundly tiresome (and not merely for its popularity... it is quite infantile),
it is still a decidedly tolerable and fairly professional choice.Sienna has always irritated me; it sounds very maladroit, inane, awkwardly ornamental, and tawdry. That stands for the similar Sierra, too.Best of luck,
- Francesca
vote up1
I prefer Rosemarie Sophia. Not a fan of Sienna even though I admit it does have a lovely sound.
vote up1
Sienna really doesn't do it for me. What about Rosemarie Autumn Sophia?
vote up1
I agree re: Autumn. It makes sense and would work with either Rosemarie Autumn or Rosemarie Autumn Sophia.
vote up1
Rosemarie Sienna. Sophia sounds like nails on a chalkboard to me (it's the harsh S combined with the fee-sound), sorry! I think it's a name that is loved by many, though, so I'm sure most kids would love to have it. I just don't care for the sound. Sienna is soft, pretty and less common so it's what I'd go with. I don't like the Sienna Miller association but it seems to fade now that more and more girls are named Sienna. I also like the color. Personally I think yes, she's too young to honor. Naming a child after her would be like naming your child after her older sibling or something. I don't know why I feel this way, but it just seems a little odd to me.But she's your daughter so you have to decide what works. If you want to honor your sister, you should.
vote up1
You're not the only one who doesn't like Sophia. It's my own middle name, but I could never understand its appeal. I prefer Sophie - it's cleaner. I have to admit Rosemarie Sophia is a pretty combo. But then again, because so many people love Sophia, it could become a cliched middle name in its own right, like Rose, Marie, Elizabeth.
vote up1
I was kind of thinking she was too young to honor as well. I was just trying to find another family name, but I think Sienna has more significance. It would almost be unfair to give her Sophia as a middle name, if that makes sense.
vote up1