View Message

[Opinions] James
What are your thoughts on James? Does the meaning bother you?Do you think it will ever fall out of style or fashion?Do you think it's often used as a silent first name? It's pretty high up, but I hardly ever meet children or teenagers called James or any of its nicknames.Which image do you get from James?Which nickname is the most stylish one right now? Which one seems dated?I think, like with Elizabeth, its nicknames have gone in and out of style. I feel like Jimmy and Jim are quite 40s/50s and actually likely to come back into style in a few years. Jamie feels very 70s/80s/maybe early 90s to me. James feels more current, as I feel most young men don't use a nickname. Jimbo feels 50s too. Jay feels uncommon. Maybe a bit 80s/90s. With Elizabeth I feel like Bessie is early 1900s, Betty is 30s/40s, Liz is 50s/60s, Lizzie 70s/80s, Libby 90s and Elizabeth 2000s+.Which one is your favorite and which images do you get? Is it boring?James
James "Jim"
James "Jimbo"
James "Jimmy"
James "Jay"
James "Jamie"Thanks :)

This message was edited 12/3/2023, 11:54 AM

vote up2

Replies

I don't get the appeal of James, honestly. There are so many better classic names for boys.
vote up2
Not a fan
It's more like an a low effort choice that to me doesn't show much personality same with John, Thomas and etc I think there are way better names out there to choose from
vote up3
This name would probably bore me if I didn't have a character I liked with this name. In that case, I like it.
vote up1
I like James. It’s also on my list cause my grandpas name was James.I don’t like Jamie or Jay, and Jim is okay but Jimmy is adorable.What’s the meaning that could be bothersome though?
vote up1
The meaning could be considered negative since it essentially means "supercede and replace". Sort of like "cutting in line" or "usurper".
vote up1
Thanks! I actually don’t mind that meaning, given the context of the biblical story. Kinda serves as a reminder that our name or even birthright don’t define us, but rather our character.That kinda makes me love it more.
vote up2
I am neutral about James. Among James' nicknames, I like Jam, Jamie, and Jay.
vote up1
I've always liked James; the meaning doesn't bother me at all.
It's been around for a good long time. I don't see it disappearing, but it did have a surge in popularity in the 1990s and is fading a bit.
James seems positive to me; it's certainly a stayer.
Silent first name - who knows?
I don't think James needs a nickname: that is one of the things I like about it.
vote up1
I like James. I think because it contains the word "jam". Jam is great. I guess James is pretty boring, but among the boring names it's one I enjoy. James feels very.... Calm. Self assured. Classy. There's a smoothness to it, like fine fabric. Jamie is awful though, and I do hope Jim and Jimmy comes back in style.
vote up1
After looking at the meaning, Jam would be an adorable nickname for a twin called James. I may use that if I’m ever blessed with twins. :)(Also totally agreed on Jim / Jimmy; it’s adorable)
vote up2
Love it, but then its a family name. A solid classic, it will never be out of fashion. Currently know 2 young men called James, 2 older guys called Jim, and that pretty much tells the relative popularity of the diminutives.
vote up1
I’ve always found James dreadfully dull. No image comes to mind because it’s so anonymous.ETA: One of my childhood friends named her son James Charles, and his last name is Thomas: James Charles Thomas. Horrid!

This message was edited 12/3/2023, 12:29 PM

vote up2
Great names my file was Jim and Jimbo late 30sMy great nephew is James, he's 2There are a number of James at school 12-18 and on Jimmy 13, I know a number in primary school and in there 20sDon't really like Jamie I like the name, a timeless classic, not boring

This message was edited 12/3/2023, 12:10 PM

vote up1