View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: A Little Dilemma With Honour Names (Warning: long!)
Yeah, I see how it makes you cringe. Naming four sons after yourself doesn't make it a tradition, and if any naming after oneself looks "stupid," it's gotta be naming all four of your sons after yourself. Haha. If I were your husband, I'd want to step out of my dad's shadow by naming a son anything but James.Anyway, if he's supposed to follow the James "tradition" then shouldn't his own brothers all follow it, too, and ought every one of the child's male cousins on Dad's side also have the same name? Nobody needs that much "honoring," IMO. Too silly!It was satisfying (to me anyway) to put honoring names in the middle slot. I gave my son my (deceased) father's name as a middle name. However I don't think I'd have regretted it terribly, if my husband had objected and we'd just used a name we both liked, instead. It wasn't something worth going to the mat over. It seemed really important when I was pregnant, but now the boy is named - and although I am happy I gave him the honoring name, I realize it wasn't that crucial after all.- mirfak
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Yes, and I know for a fact that his brothers will use 'James' -- They are all for tradition. I also think it's completely silly. I know they wouldn't create a spectacle if we don't use it, but I'm a bit scared my son will feel like an outsider. There are several other people from my family (and his, too) that I'd like to honor.Thanks for your opinion!
vote up1