Popularity in Scotland
compared to Calum
Numbers
| Callum (masculine) | Calum (masculine) | |||||
| Year | Rank | Percent Used | Rank | Percent Used | ||
| 2023 | #58 | 0.365 | - | - | ||
| 2022 | #58 | 0.383 | - | - | ||
| 2021 | #56 | 0.399 | - | - | ||
| 2020 | #40 | 0.517 | - | - | ||
| 2019 | #41 | 0.483 | - | - | ||
| 2018 | #32 | 0.592 | - | - | ||
| 2017 | #34 | 0.588 | - | - | ||
| 2016 | #28 | 0.687 | #85 | 0.283 | ||
| 2015 | #19 | 0.875 | #94 | 0.247 | ||
| 2014 | #21 | 0.867 | #75 | 0.320 | ||
| 2013 | #33 | 0.718 | #67 | 0.375 | ||
| 2012 | #24 | 0.872 | #68 | 0.347 | ||
| 2011 | #16 | 0.993 | #66 | 0.392 | ||
| 2010 | #19 | 1.008 | #51 | 0.485 | ||
| 2009 | #10 | 1.227 | #52 | 0.484 | ||
| 2008 | #7 | 1.295 | #40 | 0.615 | ||
| 2007 | #5 | 1.485 | #34 | 0.670 | ||
| 2006 | #3 | 1.868 | #30 | 0.783 | ||
| 2005 | #3 | 1.848 | #34 | 0.737 | ||
| 2004 | #10 | 1.617 | #46 | 0.609 | ||
| 2003 | #8 | 1.587 | #34 | 0.773 | ||
| 2002 | #10 | 1.529 | #33 | 0.786 | ||
| 2001 | #6 | 1.815 | #31 | 0.836 | ||
| 2000 | #10 | 1.713 | #29 | 0.916 | ||
| 1999 | #12 | 1.706 | #30 | 0.945 | ||
| 1998 | #10 | 1.777 | #25 | 1.143 | ||
| 1997 | #20 | 1.373 | #27 | 1.098 | ||
| 1996 | #19 | 1.464 | #24 | 1.219 | ||
| 1995 | #21 | 1.328 | #24 | 1.214 | ||
| 1994 | #21 | 1.315 | #28 | 1.067 | ||
| 1993 | #26 | 1.189 | #29 | 1.032 | ||
| 1992 | #24 | 1.122 | #30 | 0.946 | ||
| 1991 | #28 | 0.947 | #31 | 0.872 | ||
| 1990 | #29 | 0.909 | #31 | 0.832 | ||
| 1989 | #35 | 0.763 | #37 | 0.732 | ||
| 1988 | #51 | 0.543 | #37 | 0.675 | ||
| 1987 | #55 | 0.465 | #63 | 0.392 | ||
| 1986 | #65 | 0.342 | #60 | 0.390 | ||
| 1985 | #60 | 0.378 | #58 | 0.407 | ||
| 1984 | #68 | 0.290 | #70 | 0.281 | ||
| 1983 | #75 | 0.256 | #74 | 0.264 | ||
| 1982 | #78 | 0.215 | #74 | 0.263 | ||
| 1981 | #92 | 0.156 | #79 | 0.216 | ||
| 1980 | - | - | #92 | 0.147 | ||
| 1979 | - | - | #90 | 0.161 | ||
| 1978 | #94 | 0.124 | #86 | 0.167 | ||
| 1977 | - | - | #86 | 0.156 | ||
| 1976 | - | - | #83 | 0.188 | ||
| 1975 | - | - | #78 | 0.194 | ||
| 1974 | #100 | 0.098 | #78 | 0.210 | ||
| 1973 | #100 | 0.106 | #84 | 0.158 | ||
| 1972 | - | - | #81 | 0.161 | ||
| 1971 | - | - | #70 | 0.254 | ||
| 1970 | #95 | 0.107 | #71 | 0.251 | ||
| 1969 | #97 | 0.101 | #68 | 0.249 | ||
| 1968 | #90 | 0.127 | #69 | 0.239 | ||
| 1967 | #92 | 0.127 | #70 | 0.218 | ||
| 1966 | - | - | #68 | 0.243 | ||
| 1965 | #96 | 0.098 | #72 | 0.200 | ||
| 1964 | - | - | #64 | 0.246 | ||
| 1963 | #87 | 0.135 | #71 | 0.190 | ||
| 1962 | #85 | 0.135 | #70 | 0.191 | ||
| 1961 | #84 | 0.135 | #82 | 0.139 | ||
| 1960 | #91 | 0.106 | #89 | 0.117 | ||
| 1959 | #86 | 0.123 | - | - | ||
| 1958 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1957 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1956 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1955 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1954 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1953 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1952 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1951 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1950 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1949 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1948 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1947 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1946 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1945 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1944 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1943 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1942 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1941 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1940 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1939 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1938 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1937 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1936 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1935 | - | - | - | - | ||
 |
|
|||||