View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Sibling for the Royal baby?
Although there's definitely a precedent for a British monarch to use a middle name upon ascending to the throne, I'm of the opinion that this is very unlikely to happen in this day and age. In this age of mass media, when many millions more people become familiar with the faces of the royal family than in past times, and are able to see and hear them speak, and when they, along with all other celebrities, can become as familiar as a friend or family member, I don't think it will fly to say, "Call me William no more, I'm now King Arthur."
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

That's true. And using Arthur would be an egotistic choice to use, since the 'first' King Arthur is a legend and used as the ideal king. But I also heard years ago that Charles wants to be King George VII, since the two kings named Charles were not so well liked.
vote up1