Re: not what i'd call "traditional"
my excuse is that it was late last night when I posted, and while you're very nice about it, I realise I didn't word my summary very well. After re-reading the article again, it does seem to differentiate between enduring traditional names, and those considered 'old-fashioned' like Irene and Norman which are in decline. I think you have a point about some of the names they comment on. Quite a few of them, like Gertrude and Norman I don't think have ever been particularly popular in Scotland compared to England, so it's harder for me to tell, but having been looking into the family tree, I would only expect to find such names from about my grandparents generation. Any further back and you run into a seemingly endless cycle of 'traditional' names like James, Andrew, Thomas, Mary, Catherine, Isabella, most of which are still popular today. I agree with you, we do generally do alright in the UK, I struggle to find anything remotely as 'interesting' as Sabrinas posts in our bas.

*~ As bees flee hame wi' lades o' treasure, the minutes wing'd their way wi' pleasure ~*
vote up1vote down

Messages

article on British naming trends  ·  Lethe  ·  8/13/2008, 3:52 PM
Re: article on British naming trends  ·  Anneza  ·  8/13/2008, 10:51 PM
Re: article on British naming trends  ·  louise fielder  ·  9/14/2008, 6:35 AM
Re: article on British naming trends  ·  Sia  ·  8/15/2008, 6:54 AM
Re: article on British naming trends  ·  Lethe  ·  8/14/2008, 4:52 AM
not what i'd call "traditional"  ·  aquamarina  ·  8/13/2008, 5:26 PM
Re: not what i'd call "traditional"  ·  bananarama  ·  8/15/2008, 12:38 PM
Re: not what i'd call "traditional"  ·  aquamarina  ·  8/15/2008, 3:53 PM
Re: not what i'd call "traditional"  ·  Lethe  ·  8/14/2008, 4:45 AM
About Gertrude  ·  Poppylena  ·  8/14/2008, 12:42 AM
Re: About Gertrude  ·  aquamarina  ·  8/14/2008, 3:45 AM
Re: About Gertrude  ·  Anneza  ·  8/14/2008, 2:43 AM
Re: not what i'd call "traditional"  ·  penguiny7  ·  8/13/2008, 6:44 PM