Message: "it has enough personality to make up for the lack of conventional prettiness [m]"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

it has enough personality to make up for the lack of conventional prettiness [m]

by molly

12/2/2014, 8:57 PM

in reply to a message by Billina

well put!

This message was edited 12/2/2014, 8:58 PM

Replies

- puck (BBH) +1

12/3/2014, 4:11 AM

What is conventional prettiness? Utterly subjective on all accounts.

I am going to go out on a limb, and assume your talking about names like Sophia, Amelia, Olivia, and Isabella. Flimsy and vapid.

Trend city.

Esther is extremely pretty, even by classic standards. I love a capital E (red) followed by a lowercase s (sage).

This message was edited 12/3/2014, 4:12 AM

- Billina

12/3/2014, 9:54 AM

Yes, I'm talking about names that are popular and sound classically feminine, or at least more feminine than Esther. Yes, it's all subjective, but that was just MY opinion. To me, Esther isn't pretty, but it isn't ugly , either. It just doesn't have the frills that those other names have.

- queenv

12/3/2014, 3:38 AM

I think that about Pearl.

View Message

Replies