New Post
Search
HelpRe: Amy
in reply to a message by Sue D. Nym
It's always been meh to me, although I think I should like it more than I do due to its "Little Women" connection. I think I'd like it more if it hadn't been so popular when I was young.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
The name Amy seemed so out of place in Little Women! Especially because the other sisters actually had long names with short nicknames, and Amy was just a short name by itself (and one that I at least associate with a more contemporary setting... contemporary to me, that is, not to Louisa May Alcott)
1
I've always assumed that Alcott used the name Amy because it's an anagram of the name of the real-life sister upon whom the character was based, May. Beth was based upon her sister Lizzie, and there both the character and the real-life sister had the full name Elizabeth. But I don't know why Anna and Louisa are not at all similar to Margaret nn Meg and Josephine nn Jo.
1
Margaret is a puzzle. Meg works so well as a nn for the character, and then when her fashionable friends call her something else - was it Daisy, like her future daughter? - it's just stylistically wondrous. And I've always wondered, if that sequence was based on reality, whatever Anna could use as a nn instead of Nan or Nancy.
As for Louisa, IRL she was Louie = Louis (m), so Josephine, nn Jo instead of Joe, is a good stand-in. Stephanie, for instance, would shorten naturally to Steffie or Steph, not Steve, thus missing the point.
As for Louisa, IRL she was Louie = Louis (m), so Josephine, nn Jo instead of Joe, is a good stand-in. Stephanie, for instance, would shorten naturally to Steffie or Steph, not Steve, thus missing the point.
1