View Message

Violet Elizabeth
My niece has just started listening to Just William books on tape. Just William was written between 1922 and 1970. One of the female characters is a 6 year old called Violet Elizabeth. I like both names but the character is a whiny and precocious 6 year who cannot understand why the 11 year old protagonist and his friends won’t play with her. As a result of this image I could never use the names together.WDYT of Violet Elizabeth?Hoping for
Howard Ian James Graham
Carys Lynette Ottilie Rose

This message was edited 8/17/2020, 9:50 AM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

It's nice enough, rather Victorian or Edwardian. It's missing the wow factor for me, but you can't go wrong with this name.
vote up1
It's a very nice, classic combo. Really practical and unproblematic. However as nice as it is, I think it sounds slightly better the other way around.
vote up1
I don't like it, but that's because I don't care for Violet much. It's nice in some other accents, but not in mine. Way too close to "violent." I like the color and the flower, but I could live without it as a human name.
vote up1
Violet Elizabeth is beautiful and very classic and timeless. It would age wonderfully too. Feminine, strong and pretty, all at the one time. I like it.
vote up1
I have an image in my head nowOf an actress called bonnie Langford as violet Elizabeth bott screaming I'll be sick sick sick from an adaptation in the 70's
vote up1
I have an image in my head nowOf an actress called bonnie Langford as violet Elizabeth bott screaming I'll be sick sick sick from an adaptation in the 70's
vote up1
That is something Violet Elizabeth says. “I want to play with you and if I can’t I’ll scream and scream until I’m sick.” “I can.”
vote up1
I don't like the name Violet
vote up1
I'm at one with William! Regardless of its owner, the name is so soporific that I'm amazed that people still take sleeping pills; they could just repeat "Violet Elizabeth" 25 times and they'd sleep for nine hours.
vote up1
Although Elizabeth is a filler middle name, it goes particularly well with Violet. I can't deny that this is a beautiful combination, though a different middle name might be more exciting.
vote up1
If she's always called "Violet Elizabeth" as a double name then it does sound pretentious. As a combo Elizabeth Violet might sound better. (I haven't read the books, but it doesn't sound that bad to me. All 6 year olds would seem whiny when compared to older people, and if anything I'd think the 11 year olds were being annoying because they wouldn't play with someone younger than them.)
vote up1
For obviously reasons, I love Elizabeth (well, Elisabeth). Violet is also very pretty. The combo is classic, safe and thus somewhat boring. But I like good, classic names so I don’t hate it.
vote up1
Violet’s nice, though Elizabeth is pretty bland as a middle name. Something like Violet Isabel or Violet Sabela would have been better.
vote up1
I *saw* this combo, but I didn't *notice* it right away. I had to read it again. It's perfectly fine and it's pretty, but it's BORING. There is no risk, here. I have never read those books, but I kind of feel for that character, lol. I was the baby sister, and I wanted to play with my older brother and his friends. I get it.
vote up1
I adore Violet, and Elizabeth used to be one of my favourite names, but I think it's too common in the middle spot.
vote up1
I love Violet. Elizabeth is far too generic as a middle name for my taste. I realized this a couple of years ago when I attended several graduation ceremonies one summer. When students were being introduced, pretty much every other girl was named something Elizabeth.
vote up1
No styleI actually like Violet, but this combo is painfully bland. Plus, the "let" in Violet clashes with the "el" in Elizabeth. If a parent were to name their child this, I'd (perhaps unfairly, sure) assume they put minimal thought into it.
vote up1
I agree
vote up1
I like both of the names individually, but not together.
vote up1