Funny you should mention the test of time, because
Katherine actually is sounding a little dated to me! There were so many people named
Cathy and
Kathy,
Kathryn and
Kate and
Katie and
Kitty among people about 25 and up, and I haven't seen any young Katherines in a long time. The reason, I figure, is that people see it as overused and boring.
Check out these curves
http://www.behindthename.com/top/name/katherine,elizabeth,julia,sophiaKatherine and
Elizabeth follow the same trend as
Julia, which is dated according to most people - only they have fallen relatively farther, as they were even more common for longer.
Of course it'll stand the test of time, because of famous bearers and because it's just a beautiful name. So will
Sophia. And who's to say, maybe when I'm an old lady
Katherine and
Mary and
Elizabeth and
Anna will seem unusual and fresh again, and
Sophia will seem like one of the most boring names. But right now,
Katherine's boring. Taken in isolation from everything else, it's not boring, but my image of it is sort of like the
Mona Lisa, or
Ode to
Joy ... something well-known and appreciated for good reason, but which is so ubiquitous that it has become like a generic symbol for the category (paintings, music, names for women). Those things will stand the test of time, sure, but that doesn't mean they stay
interesting decade after decade.
- mirfakThis message was edited 5/23/2015, 5:27 PM