No one should ever suffer a name to be different than the name s/he provides. If the parent guardian is the name giver--and the child seems to respond, or prefer, one version better than another - cannot this child / person use it?
Sadly, not necessarily. People often allow themselves liberties based upon common knowledge - which little involves individual preference.
The following is a fictitious set of possibilities - some or all of this quite probably occurs more often than anyone can know.
If my name were
Samantha but prefer,
Sam, and were only addressed as
Samantha when parents were upset or trying to scold or punish me, should the parent/guardian have the right to call me
Samantha?
Suddenly I am in school (kindergarten?): a teacher decides not to address me as
Sam, which I prefer, but
Samantha, because there is another
Samantha (or
Samuel) in the same class who has already been deemed the name
Sam. Sadly - the teacher will call me as s/he prefers in any situation. Isn't this sad?
As I grow I seem to prefer the name
Samantha - but after working so (damn) hard for folks to address me as
Sam, I learned to enjoy the "more serious" connotation of the formal name. So now that I am an adult, I am in the working world. I want to be
Samantha (not
Sam). Unfortunately for me, another
Samantha, who joined the company prior to me has already been deemed that name. So I am
Sam - yet eventually, the other
Samantha moves on to another position, and I am stuck with the name
Sam - yet this little involves me, my person, or my preference.
This message was edited 4/22/2018, 1:58 AM