Re: Phonetics and Linguistics
Oh, but that's no fun! Unecessary linguistic complications make the world go round! Besides, there's no *true* synonym in English--they all have different connotations (yeah, I'll just tell myself that...).As for sounds . . . you could check out some Asian languages, as you didn't list any and it seems likely they would have some (Japanese "r" comes to mind, though I'm not sure if it's quite what you're looking for. It's pronounced as sort of a combination r/l that ends up sounding similar to--but not exactly like--"d." Heh heh. Well, to me it does. But I don't know if having that kind of r-sound would be a good idea in a language with two other ones already, especially if you're aiming for unconfusing and easy to speak.)No poetry, no puns, no metaphors. . . . Hey, you could always learn a computer programming language! ^_^ (Actually, that might be an interesting thing to look at--computer languages. Give you ideas and whatnot. Or math/music.)
vote up1vote down

Messages

Phonetics and Linguistics  ·  Silver  ·  11/9/2002, 12:36 AM
To Y.  ·  Silver  ·  11/15/2002, 10:22 PM
Re: To Y.  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/17/2002, 12:08 AM
Um... im not older... im only 16 n/t  ·  Silver  ·  11/17/2002, 6:37 PM
lol, ill be 17 in one week from today!! n/t  ·  Silver  ·  11/18/2002, 6:58 PM
Happy B-day! Y :D n/t  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/19/2002, 11:01 PM
Yes, you are too! I have been sixteen for one week today! n/t  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/17/2002, 7:38 PM
Re: Yes, you are too! I have been sixteen for one week today! n/t  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/26/2002, 6:18 AM
Re: Yes, you are too! I have been sixteen for one week today! n/t  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/26/2002, 10:51 AM
On constructed languages  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/11/2002, 8:39 AM
Re: On constructed languages  ·  Phyllis  ·  11/19/2002, 9:26 PM
Re: On constructed languages  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/22/2002, 2:20 AM
Pavlos:  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/22/2002, 4:02 PM
Aha :) n/t  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/22/2002, 11:51 PM
Re: On constructed languages  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/19/2002, 11:11 PM
Re: On constructed languages  ·  Nana  ·  11/12/2002, 4:57 AM
PS  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/12/2002, 6:26 AM
More on "Macedonian" as a constructed language  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/12/2002, 6:17 AM
Re: More on "Macedonian" as a constructed language  ·  Nana  ·  11/12/2002, 2:20 PM
Re: More on "Macedonian" as a constructed language  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/13/2002, 1:56 AM
You somehow...  ·  Pavlos  ·  11/11/2002, 7:32 AM
Pavlos (aka CheBanana)...  ·  Phyllis  ·  11/20/2002, 2:03 PM
Re: You somehow...  ·  Holly  ·  11/12/2002, 4:12 PM
lol, i thoroughly enjoyed that, thanks for the laugh ;-) n/t  ·  Silver  ·  11/11/2002, 7:20 PM
A note to Yahalome  ·  Silver  ·  11/10/2002, 4:05 PM
Re: A note to Yahalome  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/11/2002, 4:40 PM
i think i get sumthin...  ·  Silver  ·  11/10/2002, 4:22 PM
Re: i think i get sumthin...  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/11/2002, 4:14 PM
Basically then...  ·  Silver  ·  11/12/2002, 7:39 PM
Re: Basically then...  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/12/2002, 11:18 PM
my dad has one  ·  Silver  ·  11/12/2002, 11:25 PM
Re: my dad has one  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/14/2002, 4:34 PM
one more thing on the loopy n  ·  Silver  ·  11/12/2002, 7:44 PM
Re: one more thing on the loopy n  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/12/2002, 11:25 PM
lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Silver  ·  11/13/2002, 8:37 PM
Re: lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Lilith  ·  11/15/2002, 7:26 PM
Re: lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/16/2002, 5:29 PM
Re: lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/16/2002, 5:28 PM
Re: lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Lilith  ·  11/17/2002, 9:41 PM
Re: lol! questions on q, x, wh, and w  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/14/2002, 4:23 PM
A note ot Mike C  ·  Silver  ·  11/9/2002, 11:43 PM
Re: Phonetics and Linguistics  ·  Lilith  ·  11/9/2002, 12:28 PM
Re: Phonetics and Linguistics  ·  Satu  ·  11/9/2002, 6:12 AM
Re: Phonetics and Linguistics  ·  jdptsax  ·  2/10/2003, 7:42 AM
wow that really helps thanks! ill do ur suggestions n/t  ·  Silver  ·  11/9/2002, 11:46 PM
Re: Phonetics and Linguistics  ·  Yahalome  ·  11/9/2002, 12:54 AM
email  ·  Silver  ·  11/9/2002, 11:47 PM