View Message

Why Do People Like This Name?
Is there a name that has you cocking your head in confusion whenever you hear someone talking about how much they love it? Not necessarily an ugly name, but a more mainstream name that gets a lot of love/appreciation that you just don't like? If you have a name like that, put it in the subject line, then read the replies from people who love it. Listen to their reasons for loving it, just for kicks. Or agree with the other people who hate it; either way, I thought it would be a fun thing to do. I'll put mine up in just a mo'. :P "And by the way, dearie, your punctuation sucks canal water!"
-The Ghost of Vivian Vance
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

OwenWhat is everyone doing liking Owen
vote up1
Jillian.
vote up1
It's a happy, wholesome, jolly ol' name. I love Jillian!
vote up1
Violet & CharlesI do not get what the appeal is!
vote up1
Violet is pretty to me. I think of the flowers and the colour and I just like it. Charles of the other hand, well I don't get the appeal of it either.
vote up1
ditto about Charles.It seems so smarmy to me.
vote up1
GraceI posted about George earlier, but I kept seeing Grace mentioned in other comments, so I had to ask about it here, in its own post.Grace is one of those "virtue names" common among the Puritans that has survived to this day, and is common among both young girls and older women (though in the younger generation, its use seems to be mainly as a middle name). And I don't get it. I don't even think the word "grace" is attractive - it sounds like the exact opposite of what it describes. Like someone threw a bucket of ice water in your face. Honestly, I find (the admittedly dated) Joyce to be more attractive.So... what's the appeal of Grace? Is it just the definition of the name? Or am I the only one put off by the sound?
vote up1
I'd never enjoyed Grace and then I had a lovely colleague whose brother started calling her Dis when they were toddlers and has never stopped. You must admit, that's not encouraging! Also, yes it's a virtue name, but theologically it's not a favourite. I can readily imagine a Jewish Felicity, for instance, or Joy, but not Grace. Too specific.
vote up1
I am glad someone else hates this. It reminds me of Grease.
vote up1
LiamLets just hack a name in half, shall we?Ian at least gets a letter changed. :P
vote up1
Liam has been a longstanding Irish name, and prior to the new millennium most Liams likely had Irish ancestry somewhere down the line. It didn't even chart in America until the end of the 60s. I don't know about Canada, but I think Liam has historically always been more common in Ireland and the U.K.Nowadays, however, I think parents are gravitating toward it because they already like William, but there are entirely too many Wills running around; so this way they avoid the Will nickname.
vote up1
All definitely true, but it still looks like William with its head cut off. :P
vote up1
I can't picture Liam on a grown American man. The only American Liam I've heard of who wasn't a child or young teenager is Liam O'Brien (if you're not familiar with him, he's a voice actor).I feel like Canadian name trends tend to be closer to American name trends than British ones.
vote up1
Nowadays, however, I think parents are gravitating toward it because they already like William, but there are entirely too many Wills running around; so this way they avoid the Will nickname....Except Liam by itself is in the top 5 names!
vote up1
That wasn't always the case. Liam's upsurge in popularity is a recent development (within the last four years or so), and many parents don't bother checking popularity charts, so they probably still think William / "Will" is way more popular because they grew up around so many.A lot of people still think John & Mary are the most popular names in the country.
vote up1
I just mean they're not using Liam as a nickname for William. I kinda doubt half of these people even realize it's a short form of William.
vote up1
Honestly, I think using Liam as a nickname for William is kind of stupid. I really hate it when people give their kids nicknames that are also names in their own right (i.e. using Nathan as a nickname for Nathaniel or Jonathan).
vote up1
Nathan is a legitimate name in its own right though. It isn't a nickname for Nathaniel or Jonathan necessarily. There was a Nathan in the Bible. It just has some of the same elements.
vote up1
That's exactly what Laslow means.However, Liam is not really a name in its own right, it's purely derived from William.
vote up1
Most people think that the names that were popular in their generation are still the most popular names. Until their kid enters school, and they meet other kids their kid's age, and realize that's not true. ;) It's hard to get a sense of what's popular if you don't already have kids or are a teacher or L&D nurse.Or you're one of those crazy name nerds like us that actually look up the popularity ratings. :P

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 2:05 PM

vote up1
ElsieI guess it's not super popular, but it's gaining steam as the go-to pick for "quirky" parents and I just don't get it. Of all the cute old-school names to resurrect, why Elsie?? Where did it come from?? What need does Elsie fulfill?? I felt the same way about Matilda.
vote up1
I think Elsie is adorable! It's slightly quirky, with that vintage feel that the "hipsters" seem to love! Now I'm no hipster, but I do think the name is lovely and will suit a female of any age. Matilda is lovely too.
vote up1
I think it fills the same niche as Liam and Kaitlyn. Variants on previously super-popular names. Perhaps for honoring purposes, perhaps just because Elizabeth, William, and Katherine seem dusty and boring.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 10:21 AM

vote up1
I think it sounds like the name of a cow. Not attractive.
vote up1
Elliot
vote up1
E.T. *drops mic*;)
vote up1
Is it wrong that I actually don't like the movie E.T.?

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 2:12 PM

vote up1
Yes. Yes, it is.
vote up1
Elliot couldn't hurt anyone, and he sounds smart but also trustworthy. It's melodic and safe.
vote up1
Jack
vote up1
I don't get Jack either
vote up1
Handsome, timeless, masculine, easy to say and spell and suits a male of any age. Those reasons are the appealing things to this name imo.
vote up1
It's just so friendly. Who doesn't like a Jack?
vote up1
It's a cool name. It don't need no bells and whistles.
vote up1
JACK! It's exciting without being too risky! JACK! It's a karate chop! JACK! It's an exclamation mark! JACK!
vote up1
AubreyI mean, I get why people like it, but it seems so plain to me. No personality, at all. :P
vote up1
It's warm and even earthy to me. I like it for either.
vote up1
I think it sounds more feminine than masculine, so I'm okay with it switching, but I hate it because of the "aaaw" sound. *retch*
vote up1
I have an old high school friend on FB who named her daughter Aubrey (not sure of the middle name). She's pregnant with another girl, and I want to know what she will name this one. Caitlyn? No, too 90's. Harper? Riley? Saylor? No matter what, it's going to be boring as fuuuuuuck. :P
vote up1
My good friend is naming her daughter Aubrey Grace. If it was a boy it would name been Aubrey James. I couldn't pretend to support either, and almost all of the people I mention it are like, "well, thank God it's a girl," and then they're like "It's so dull," and it really is a dull name, especially with her last name. I've had to bite my tongue. For a while she was at least open to Aubrey Lavinia, which I suggested, and it livened it up a bit, but now, it's Aubrey Grace, and I have given up.
vote up1
That name is Wonder Bread and a glass of water. Appetizing.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 10:22 AM

vote up1
Lavinia is an excellent name to pair with Aubrey. Perfectly matches the inky soul I see Aubrey having. Is it just me or does Grace immediately make ANY name automatically dull??
vote up1
It's not just you. It's livelier as a first name, but it's easier to use as a middle name, so people stick it after EVERYTHING. It's this generation's Marie.
vote up1
Aubrey Beardsley!This name is redeemed for me because of the artist. His stuff is really cool, it's like creepy-swirly Art Nouveau. Yah, he was a guy, but his art is very sensual and femme fatale-esque, so it works as a girl name for me because of it. Check him out!https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_Beardsley Also Aubrey has a neat meaning. I don't mind it, overall.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 9:30 AM

vote up1
That guy is pretty awesome. He died at 25? Sad.Still, this is a classic example of why I don't like it on a boy, either. It sounds like the name of a velvet dandy from the 1890's. Not my thing. :P
vote up1
THIS one. It's so... um... ugly and bad? It looks ugly, sounds ugly, ... ?????"brey" is such an ugly way to get to "bree." Ew it just looks so ugly to me
vote up1
It's fine as long as it's on a male. Really fine, because then its whole long history kicks in. But on a female it's just silly.
vote up1
I considered putting this as my example, but then I was thinking:It reminds me of birds, like...augury.
It also reminds me of loafers...and not sure why, or if that's a bad thing or not.
I like it more than Audrey, at least.
vote up1
I like it for a boy. Basically just 'cause of Aubrey Beardsley...But I agree, on a girl it's kind of drab. Cute but blah.
vote up1
EmmaWhy is it so popular, I never been a huge fan of this name but it is popular all over the world.
Just noticed this was already posted. Sorry about that
PNL: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/151224

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 7:02 PM

vote up1
I'd say...It's easy to pronounce, easy to spell, and has a warm, comforting presence to it. It's got great namesakes in both history and literature, too.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 9:36 AM

vote up1
CharlotteWhy?
vote up1
It was my grandmother's name, and I've never disliked it, but it does seem a bit weird to me that it's gotten so popular.
The more popular it gets, the duller it sounds to me.These are my associations/impressions:Reserved and persnickety. (my grandmother, born in the 1920s)
Sweet and unassuming. (a friend from high school, born in the 1980s)
Quirky-cute. ("Chuck" a character from a TV show, Pushing Daisies)
19th century literature. (Charlotte Bronte, author of Jane Eyre)
Alternative rock, late 1990s-present. (Good Charlotte is a band)
My childhood best friend named her daughter Charlotte "Charlie" last year.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 1:33 PM

vote up1
It's lovely and gray, with silky pink accents. It's floral without being your grandmother's couch. It's white lace and meadows and fresh spring scents, and slim, white hands that have never been exposed to back-breaking work. It's sweetness and light, but it isn't simple or dim-witted. It's a girl who isn't going to accept the first marriage offer, because she is holding out for something better. It's a girl with backbone who doesn't have to swing a sword. And that is why I like Charlotte. :)
vote up1
I have a theory. My dumpy, frizzy brown-haired, thick glasses and orthopedic shoes-wearing, virgin-not-by-choice Charlotte was all those things when she was young, but it turned out she held out too long and there was nothing better, so now she's bitter and let herself go.
vote up1
My Charlotte finally weds a dashing Mr. Darcy type. So, NYAAAH to you. ;)
vote up1
Elizabeth / Lizzy / Eliza got Mr. Darcy.Charlotte got stuck with Mr. Collins because she was too afraid of becoming a spinster to hold out for someone better.
vote up1
To be fair, I said a Mr. Darcy type . Charlotte can be just as spunky as Elizabeth, says I.
vote up1
I agree that Charlotte can be spunky. I just think that's an ironic example.
vote up1
I used to like it.I used to really like this name - I had the stock combo Charlotte Olivia Florence in my Top 10 for a long time.Then I got sick of Charlotte. Like really, really sick of it all of a sudden. It just sounded... weightless, but also flabby. Like a flabby feather, if that makes sense. Now whenever I hear it (which is a lot), I scratch my head and wonder why so many parents are choosing a name with so little oomph to it. (It's to get the nickname Charlie, isn't it?)Present-day, I much prefer Carol. :-)

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 10:20 AM

vote up1
Okay, I am going to use "flabby feather" to describe certain names from now on.
vote up1
My grandma agrees with you, she practically barfs whenever she hears the name. I guess it's just another old-fashioned name whose time has come again. It's got royalty (dead and otherwise) behind it. Also it's super-feminine but has a tomboy loophole, so people feel like they have options.
vote up1
I think it's the feminine-name-with-a-boys-nickname that makes it so appealing to modern parents. The ones that feel drawn to the boys-names-on-girls trend, but are too traditional to actually take that step.
vote up1
AtticusI seriously don't get the appeal of this name on name boards. It's practically cliche for celebrity kids and hipster kids. I don't like the fact that the first five letters spell "attic", and it kind of reminds me of "abacus". And while I did like To Kill a Mockingbird, it's not one of my top books (but then again, I do acknowledged that I'm biased).

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 6:19 PM

vote up1
I get why people use it, but I agree that it is insufferable. I watch a lot of "House Hunter" type shows on HGTV, and every slightly hipster couple looking for a house has a young son named Atticus. Yeah, real original, guys. *sigh*
vote up1
I'm glad I'm not the only one who is sick of hearing the name Atticus.
vote up1
To Kill a Mockingbird introduced me to this name when I was young in my 'name-nerd' career; although intensively studying the book for school turned me off it for a little while, I soon realised the importance of it and came to love it - and the names it had spurned.Since then however, Atticus has become so much more to me than "that name from that book", it held position on my top ten list for a long time and is still on my long list. I think "Attie" is a cute nickname when an Atticus is young, but it can grow well and embodies a sophisticated, chiselled image.I have seen the birth announcements increase for Attics in recent years, but celebrity wise there are no high-profile births for Atticus that I can think of off the top of my head and I've only ever heard of one Atticus in real life (he's aged somewhere between 6-10 years old).So, for me, in England, Atticus still holds some obscurity.
vote up1
It just has character.
vote up1
Harper (f).
vote up1
I think people use it because of Harper Lee, and by extension, the character of Scout. It's a tomboyish name for people who don't want an icky GIRL, and its literary association makes them look smart. God, I'm being a bitch today, LOL.
vote up1
I really really hate this name (mostly for the sound of it I think) and can't believe how popular it is now!
vote up1
Isa, Isaiah/Isiah & Isaac/Isaak
vote up1
Can't speak on Isaac or Isa but Isaiah is just...sigh. So handsome and has such an open sound. Though I get why someone wouldn't like it - it's not really your stereotypical solid, masculine-sounding name (I'm speaking as an American); it's not like Samuel, Adam, Christopher, etc. And it has that uncommon "z"-sound in the middle.But I love it!

This message was edited 5/6/2016, 8:31 AM

vote up1
I really like guys' names that start with I, as a group. Always have. Don't know why.
vote up1
Isaac is one of my favorite male names, actually; and when I was a kid I actually preferred Isaiah. And now, one of my favorite female names is Iris. I seem to be attracted to the long-I sound.
vote up1
I love Isaac.
It's been high on my list for a while and I remember it being one of the first ever names that I recognised as loving for a future son.While not a fan of potential nicknames (Zak or Issy), I don't mind Isaac standing on it's own while I might with other names. Isaac doesn't feel popular (where I am in England) but it's well-known enough for people to be able to pronounce and spell it.I like the sound of Isaac, a nice mixture of soft and hard letters. It ages very well also, I feel.
vote up1
I don't think I've seen the male name Isa discussed here. I thought people would be put off to it because it's a form of Jesus (which most people seem to consider too holy to be used as a name).I don't recall seeing the female name Isa discussed much on here either.
vote up1
Mia
vote up1
It's just so cute and has a pretty sound. It short yet sweet.
vote up1
It's cute, sweet and has a history to it. The sound is simple, too. I really like it.
vote up1
I'm not a huge fan of Mia - mainly because it means "mine" - but I do see its appeal, which is very similar to the appeal of Mila and Lia. It's simple, but it grows up, and is not chilly or androgynous. Uma Thurman as Mia Wallace in Pulp Fiction.
vote up1
Hi !!!!I agree with you!!!Mia in my language means "my, of mine".
It is a horrible egocentric meaning..Byeeeeeeeeeeeeee

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:43 PM

vote up1
Yeah. Never liked Mia. It's so saccharine.
vote up1
Avery
vote up1
I agreeI used to sort of like Avery as a male middle name - but only as a middle, and only male. However, more often than not it's used on girls these days, and I don't get it. At all.Is it because the first syllable is similar to that of Ava?
vote up1
I think Avery is an awful name for either sex. It reminds me of a farm boy with a really ear-grating accent.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 6:29 PM

vote up1
I think people who like it must think it sounds enough like names such as Rosalie, Hilary, Marjorie, and Emily, to be feminine. And yet it's a surname-name, so it has that "spunky / aloof" air, that I think derives from calling sports participants and famous subjects by their surnames. I imagine those who like Avery (f) are people who would use Ava, but they think that it sounds too old-fashioned or matronly.
vote up1
I do NOT understand why people use Avery on girls. I don't have a problem with names switching sides, so to speak, but Avery is all boy to me. Doesn't sound girly at all.
vote up1
Hi !!!!I think it is horrible for both...
It is ugly...and a surname...
And in my mind has not links with something positive.
Only an empty sad box.
But I'm Italian, it isn't in my culture...
Maybe in English speaking world there is a reason...I don't know why it is so popular TTByeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 4:03 PM

vote up1
Abigail...
vote up1
It's biblical, part of the meaning is "joy", and I think it sounds kind of strong in a wholesome/approachable way? ...I dunno. I don't think it's quite my style, but I've never disliked it.My main associations with it are Abigail Adams, Dear Abby, and my two-year-old cousin who is adorable.
vote up1
Agree. Total hatred. Do not get the appeal.
vote up1
Agree ... a big ail.
I like Gail, though! It's sunny. I guess Abigail might be, too, if it weren't so old-fashioned seeming.
vote up1
Hi !!!I agree with you!!!!
I strongly dislike it!Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
vote up1
George, et alI like plenty of other names that begin with the "dzh" sound: Josephine, Jonathan, Juliet, James, Genevieve...But not George. Nor Georgia, Georgina, Georgette... None have ever appealed to me.
vote up1
Nooo! Georgina has been a love of mine since I was very little. And while I've never liked Georgia, Georgette has been growing on me and George is significant for me too.Maybe it's the repeated 'dzh' sound that puts you off, but I like the sound that the majority of George names bring.George itself is solid and strong. Dependable and wearable by all ages, dispositions, class and career.
Georgina is the more elegant female version, it's less popular than Georgia which is why it appeals to me. Georgette is for those who are after something a bit different.
vote up1
I want to love George because I love the meaning. I like down to earth names. But I am not very fond of the sound. It's a bit harsh and cut off. I would use it if it was the only thing DH and I could agree on, but it's definitely not a top 10 name.I like the sound of Georgia better, but it's a state, and not one I'm terribly fond of. So that makes it pretty unusable for me. All the other variants are too fussy.
vote up1
I love George! It seems so well-rounded and earthy to me, plus I think it's fun to say. :)I hate Georgia and Georgina (because I dislike names that are also US states, and I have negative associations with Gina).I think Georgette and Georgiana are okay.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 11:47 PM

vote up1
I like Georgia, mostly due to the song Georgia on My Mind. I find it sweet and spunky. Georgina and Georgette annoy me, and Georgiana makes me want to throw up. They're sickly sweet.George is just a friendly, solid, easy name. I neither like nor dislike it.
vote up1
I don't like George. It sounds precious and goofy and doesn't age well. Suits a chubby toddler, but not a handsome man. Curious George. George Bush Jr and Sr.
But, it is classic, and could be smooth if I didn't have these icky images and dislike the -urge sound at the end of it.
I like Georgia though. I think it's graceful and happy sounding.
Don't care for any other of the Georg-names... they seem fussy to me.
vote up1
I think I would dislike it pronounced with an -urge sound.

This message was edited 5/2/2016, 12:26 PM

vote up1
The reason I like George now is that I met one. I think he was in his 70s or 80s. He was goofy, hilarious and so much fun. It was that goofiness that made me like the name so much.
vote up1
Lyratyughfdghjkjhghfgf
vote up1
As some people may have mentioned - The Golden Compass.
But while this novel introduced me to the name, I never liked the book/movie or the character, strangely. So the name shouldn't have taken off for me, which it didn't for quite a few years.But now, I'm in love with most four letter, two syllable, L names that end in 'a' (not such a narrow category as you might imagine) and Lyra fits the bill perfectly.
The Golden Compass made this name recognisable, pronounceable and easy to spell. But the franchise didn't take off enough for Lyra to become a too-popular, unusable name.For a short name, Lyra has enough substance to stand alone and it feels powerful.
vote up1
The Golden CompassMy niece is Sophia Lyra, named from the Golden Compass books. The Lyra in the book was a total badass, and my niece is similar. I strongly associate it with the books and that's why I like it.
vote up1
Unfortunately, His Dark Materials really ruined this name for me, since I despise the books with a flaming passion and can't stand Philip Pullman in general. I although think it's kind of weird since it sounds similar to Lira, which is a common surname in Brazil (it's a Portuguese surname).

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 6:55 PM

vote up1
Similar to Myra and Lyla and even Kaia... it does have a prickly sound. But I think it sounds sort of rebellious or independent and maybe difficult, rather than bossy or bitchy. And I think it benefits from a slight association with musicality (lyre, lyric).
vote up1
AGREED. Lyra is awful and pretentious and AWFUL to me. Sounds like the name of a bitch.
vote up1
LOLsome names do sound bitchy
vote up1
vote up1
Hi !!!Yes..it is true.
But for me Lyra isn't among these..I'm sorry but in my opinion Jessica is better as a bitchy name TTByeeeeeeeeeee

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:52 PM

vote up1
Hi !!!Name for a bitch??
Isn't it too much?
vote up1
I could have used different words, but I didn't want to. That's how Lyra makes me feel.
vote up1
Hi !!!!Yes yes...
I didn't say that for words...
It is only that for me Lyra is ugly but not SO negative XDByeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:57 PM

vote up1
AdelaideIt's not so much that I hear the name often in real life (I did once hear of an acquaintance using it for a daughter, and I thought it sounded awkward and...frankly Amish/unworldly), but I know it gets a lot of attention on this website, which baffles me. I find the sound (especially the English pronunciation) and look of the name to be extremely unappealing; I especially do not care for the "laid" syllable. It gives me a feeling of revulsion. I also cannot manage to not associate the name with "milk maid."It's ironic because the name I'd most likely choose for a daughter, Alice, after my grandmother, is derived from the same root as Adelaide. I don't mind Ada, Adeline, or Adèle, but Adelaide I find repulsive.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 2:43 PM

vote up1
I think it's really quite pretty! Hypothetically. In real life it's actually clunky. I like how many vowels it has and how bright it is. It also looks beautiful. But ever since I said it out loud a few times it fell off of my favorites list.
vote up1
I don't get how it sounds Amish. I always thought it sounded more British than American.
vote up1
Milk maids and getting laid ... totallyAdelaide down ma life fer ya.I don't think it's supposed to be stylishly clunky / hipster, I think it's supposed to seem spiffy and vaguely French.I wish it were Adalheid. Then I would think it was stylishly clunky
vote up1
I like *because* it's a little clunky and ugly. I would never use it IRL, but I would admire the chutzpah of someone who would. It doesn't need to be pretty.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:10 PM

vote up1
I like some clunky names. I have a fondness for Dorothy and Frances, and even Irma to a degree, which aren't exactly thought of as "pretty" lately. I understand the appeal in wanting to go against the "pretty" trends, and I dabble in the practice myself.Adelaide, however, crosses the line. I find it almost offensive; nauseating.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:15 PM

vote up1
Hi !!!What means "chutzpah"?I'm among the people who would use Adelaide in real life!!!Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
vote up1
It means balls, for lack of a better word. Audacity? ;)

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:17 PM

vote up1
Hi !!!????
What I said in English????
I'm so sotty if I wrote something strange!!!! TT TT I mean "dancing parties" linked with past centuries...
You know...ehm...Valzer, elaborated gowns...What is the right word?

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 3:26 PM

vote up1
In English we say something "takes balls" ... as if you must have testicles to make you behave so ... if it involves asserting yourself rashly or with disregard for manners.I guess it's possible you are pretending to be innocent, but I'm explaining just in case.
vote up1
Hi !!!Thanks...
Something like this is said also in Italian but...On Web I found 'ball' also as a variant of 'dancing party' or 'festival' ... What is the word for this kind of dated very upperclass/ royal thing? Byeeeeeeee
vote up1
balls = con testicoli
vote up1
A gala?
vote up1
Ball is the only one I know of. Or at least, it's the only one that I have heard used to describe such a thing. A formal partner-dance party.
vote up1
Hi !!!!I agree with you only for Adelaide diminutives...
I dislike all Adela, Adele, Adeline etc...But I love Adelaide...
Firts of all because it means "noble"...
Here in Italy is an upperclass name...
I think that maybe some Savoy princesses used this name..and also German and French noblewomen.
So even if it is quite dated (also where I live) it has a romantic feel of nobilty, balls and so on.This is my opinion obviously XD.Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
vote up1
LaurenMy name (Lorena) is similar enough to be confused with Lauren, seemingly, and I get called Lauren a lot, especially cos Lorena is rare here in the UK and Lauren is hyper-common. I really dislike my first name, hardly ever go by it, but I dislike Lauren even more. It's really dowdy and heavy sounding, as well as being really common in my age-range (I know a lot of Laurens, usually nice people but that doesn't mean I like their name). It also feels really artificial and made up - there's no history or interesting story/meaning behind it beyond being a variant of Laurence. It feels like made-up name from before made-up names were so widely used. It's just unattractiveOK, maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but I just...eugh, don't like it, to a rather irrational degree. But since so many people seem to like it, I have to wonder why...? (Then again, it might just be a fad thing. I haven't run into any Laurens under the age of...eh mid-teens, it seems to be becoming far less popular, at least here)

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 2:30 PM

vote up1
Lauren bores me too. Of all names...Lauren? I like it as a mn though. I love Lorena, btw.
vote up1
Just poppin in to say I love the name Lorena!
vote up1
This lady...
vote up1
Couldn't agree with you more.
vote up1
Adelyn ...How do any -lyn names, but especially Adelyn / Adalynn etc, seem fresh and young and bright enough for a 2016 baby? After the continuous popularities of fad names like Carolyn and Kaitlyn and Brooklyn? There isn't even a right way to spell Adelyn, just a bunch of approximations. Why not Ada, Adelina, or Adeline instead?(Also Evelyn and Jocelyn.)
vote up1
Adeline is becoming trendoid too. It's becoming a "replacement" for Madeline. Adelina is getting trendy too, though I do like it. Ada seems to be making a comeback too...but Ida is still considered old lady.I seriously can't picture Carolyn on anyone younger than 40.Strange how no one names their daughters Lynn/Lynne as a first name anymore, but it's become the most generic middle name of all.
vote up1
My favorite thing about Adelyn is that it's pronounced "add-a-lyn", basically defining the trend of adding a "lyn" to any name to make it "modern" or whatever.
vote up1
Agree
vote up1
Emily ...Despite having a niece with this name, I've always found Emily to be bland, colorless and perhaps a tad insipid. Add the mn Grace and I'm tempted to scream. I just don't get the popularity of Emily. For a boy, I feel the same about Jacob or Ethan.
vote up1
Totally. And yeah I often (at least 3 or 4 times in recent years) hear parents calling for Emily Grace.The only thing that's successfully spiced it up for me is someone I know named EmilyJean.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 5:45 PM

vote up1
I love Emily. I feel like it's classic and fits a person of any age. It's definitely overused and a bit boring, given that it's been in the top 10 for like 25 years, but paired with a more unusual surname or middlename (aka not Grace), it's perfect. Anyhow, it's much better than it's cousin Emma, which feels too simply and substanceless.
vote up1
I have a cousin named Emily. She is not bland, but her name is. I hardly even notice it.
vote up1
Emma
vote up1
I don't like the name Emma either. I always thought it sounded bitchy.
vote up1
It's odd because it is very common where I am from for girls/women my age (mid-late 20s) and I have many great friends who I love dearly name Emma. I honestly can't think of an Emma I don't like. But it just seems like such a mumble of a name.
vote up1
Ditto?
vote up1
MargaretI always found it dated and boring, though I don't dislike it as much as I used to.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 2:06 PM

vote up1
I've never understood the longstanding popularity of Margaret. That middle "g" has always struck me as very harsh, and it never sounds elegant when I hear other people say it. Reminds me of grits. Margot, however, is cute and spunky, and Marguerite has extra pizazz at the end.Yet Margaret became one of the most common feminine names among English speakers for centuries. I don't understand.
vote up1
I know it's a fan favorite here on the boards, but I don't see the appeal either. Very frumpy. I highly prefer its other forms, like Margery or Margalit.
vote up1
I prefer Marjorie or Margot/Margo to Margaret. Those sound like fun, while Margaret sounds like she would whack you on the hand with a ruler for having fun.
vote up1
My preferred forms are Margherita and Marguerite.
vote up1
I think it's ugly. I never understood the so-called "beauty" of it.
vote up1
Margaret is a handsome name, imo. It's not beautiful at all to my way of thinking although I do like a few of the nns better than the name itself (Meg, Daisy, Maisie).
vote up1
I always like Margaret because it sounds appealingly buttoned-up and a bit brassy.
vote up1
I love it because it's strong primarily. You don't mess with a Margaret. And then it has lots of great nickname options that range from warm to cute to spunky.I just think it is a really versatile name with amazing history but I do understand people not liking the sound of it. You don't pick it because it's 'pretty to say', I don't think. Margaret is definitely in my short list for a hypothetical daughter.
vote up1
My name is Margaret and I like that's it's strong and harsh and not very pretty. It's unique. It had character.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 2:42 PM

vote up1
Jessica.
vote up1
I like it. It sounds good. I can't think of a better way to put my thoughts about it lol.
vote up1
Even in the early 80s when I began hearing how popular this name had become, I didn't understand the appeal of Jessica. For me, the 'sica' part was and is very unattractive although I do think Jessie and Jessa are very sweet. OTOH, my dh loves this name; it's one of his favorites.
vote up1
I dunno, it just sounds like the name of a smart and feminine person. It's sleek and not too frilly, the J is strong and the ss is soft and the ica is pleasantly sharp like in Annika. I've known so many Jessicas, almost all of them smart and nice - that probably influences what I think of it ... and I like Jess and Jessie. I guess it's not all that memorable at this point, but it hasn't become as mediocre as a lot of names that saw as much popularity. I think it also ages really well - suits a girl or woman of any age and sounds dignified but not stuckup.
vote up1
I liked it until Kourtney Kardashian used it on her daughter and turned it into a joke.
vote up1
I used to like Penelope a lot more when I was younger. Now, I think it sounds a little dumb.
vote up1
Ethan:)
vote up1
I like it because it makes me think of colonial days.
vote up1
Ethan is a handsome, Edwardian type of name to me, probably because of "Ethan Frome". I picture a guy who is friendly and good with his hands.
vote up1
I hate it too. It is so ugly to me! I have a little family member with the name and it is the name of my friend's little boy and I thought hearing it all the time and loving the bearers of it would change my mind a little, at the very least make me neutral on it, but nope.Do not get it.
vote up1
ElizabethOkay, I think I know why people like it: it's classic, never been out of style, easy to spell and say and not aambiguous, and lots of nicknames. But it's also so totally ubiquitous and to my mind, colorless and prim, and it seems nobody uses nns except possibly Ellie for young Elizabeths today.
vote up1
I don't know any Elizabeths that go by Ellie, young or old. Most go by Liz or Lizzie. One goes by Beth and one by Elizabeth in full. (last 2 are my age) There are plently of young Ellie's around, but they have different full names, like Eliana.
vote up1
I like it for all the reasons you say, adding that unlike many classic names, it's not colorless to me. Not sure why not.
vote up1
Elizabeth is grass green and blood red. Certainly not colorless, in my book.
vote up1
My BIL has a stepdaughter named Elizabeth, who is 19 years old. She goes by Lizzie.
vote up1
Elizabeth is my name. I rarely go by a nickname, but past sobriquets have included Liza and Lizard. Usually only teachers whose first language wasn't English would call me by a short-form. Lizzie, Liz, or Beth. Never Eliza or Ellie, which I might have liked more. Really any moniker is fine really so long as nobody calls me Liz.I don't view myself as having a boring name. I think of Queen Elizabeth I or even Elizabeth, mother of John the Baptist. My name has a long and colorful history and I'm proud of it.
vote up1
I'm not sure I've ever met an Elizabeth who has gone exclusively by their full name. I've also never met an Elizabeth nn Ellie. Most have been Liz or Lizzie actually. A couple of Beth and Libbys.
vote up1
Off the top of my head, I know one Elizabeth/Ellie who's a bit younger than Valerie. Her brother is Ethan and sister is Emma. I think of that as the Lazy E sibset. There was an Elizabeth in my graduating class who never went by a nn. Also a Beth who was just Beth Ann. Have known several Lizes but they have all been older than me.
All the Elizabeths my own age and down that I've known or have known of nearby gseem to go by Elizabeth.
vote up1
I actually like Elizabeth, nn Ellie, however, when it comes right down to it, I'd likely not use it when there are so many better, fresher, options out there.
vote up1
Isabella.Why do so many people think this is the perfect female name? It's so princess-y, in such a nauseating way, that I can't take it seriously. I really don't like it, but everyone is using it. 'Splain? :P
vote up1
I seem to be drawn more and more to names that begin with the letter "I", but still I don't care for it. It is becoming super overused on the current kids' generation (along with Olivia and Sophia, it's approaching "Emily-levels"). And I agree with other posters on its frilly nature - however, I don't perceive it as having nearly as many frills as, say, Cecilia or Priscilla, because that middle "b" adds a lot of weight to it.That said, while the "-ella" ending for a four-syllable name can be a bit much, I am somewhat fond of the French variant, Isabelle. Even prettier is its Scottish counterpart, Isobel.I've tried to like Isabel, but to me it looks incomplete. :-(
vote up1
Oddly enough, Prsicilla is less frilly to me. Seems more badass, in an unassuming way.
vote up1
I don't like any Isabelle names, or varients. It's personal for me. It brings on feelings of confusion and dislike.
vote up1
I feel like I'm one of the only people on here who actually likes the name Isabella. In Brazil it's not unheard of on a grown woman, so I don't see it as exceptionally childish or princessy, although the spelling Isabela seems to be more common here.

This message was edited 5/1/2016, 6:48 PM

vote up1
I hate it too, but not because it's princessy, as I don't think it is. I think it's heavy and mustachioed.
vote up1
Isabella literally gives me the feeling of a sticky drooled-on plastic Disney toy.
vote up1
Winner of best name comment.Hahahahaha...I just literally LOL-ed. Such a wonderful description haha
vote up1
Hi !!!!I agree with you!!!
I dislike Isabella very much!Its "-bella" sound is horrible.
I say that because I'm Italian so here "bella" is like "pretty"..
So name a person with this end seems...a joke, not serious in my opinion.Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
vote up1
Yeah, Isabella does get on my nerves--I find it well over-the-top. Isabel or Isobel are so much more appealing.
vote up1
I love Isobel.
vote up1
I don't like it because it's too frilly for me and also way overused but I do understand the appeal, I guess? Some people love princess-sounding names. They want a little pink-loving, glittery princess daughter. I can deal with that because preference and it does have some neat history to it. I think I hate just Bella as a given name more than Isabella.
I also don't mind Izzy. It's a bit sportier if being Princess Bella isn't her thing.
vote up1
I don't mind princess names, but this one seems over-the-top. I know too many little Izzys whose parents think they are the only ones bucking the Bella trend to like Izzy. STAHP.
vote up1
I'm not a fan of Isabella, but not because it's princessy. I don't think it is. It's the -ella that turns me off a little, it's too softened up in english. I would rather Isabel.I think people like Isabella because it's got that IZZ in it, it's sorta spunky like Liz. And the Bella part is warm and feminine and balances it out. It's not so bad!
vote up1
I'm not a huge fan of Isabella, but I can very much see the appeal. It is a princessy name, in that I'd be willing to bet it's the most commonly found female name in European monarchies, more so than its sister Elizabeth. And the Isabels and Isabellas that I can think of have all been pretty strong characters, too - one of them, I can't remember which, essentially managed to overthrow her husband. In actuality, though, I think most parents choose it now because it has "bella" in it, and the world needs to know how beautiful their particular child is.
vote up1
"The She-Wolf of France""... one of them, I can't remember which, essentially managed to overthrow her husband."That would be Isabella of France, wife of Edward II of England. Reading about some of the stuff that went down during that guy's reign is really fascinating - brutal, but fascinating; including the stuff he put his wife through. But yes, Isabella did join up with Roger Mortimer and overthrow Edward II to put her son, Edward III, on the throne. Edward III eventually had Mortimer executed for treason-*ish* reasons, but he put his mother up in a very nice castle for her retirement and she pretty much led the good life in her later years.
vote up1
Actually, Edward III put his mother under house arrest, albeit in a very nice castle. Because she, along with Mortimer, wanted her son to be King in name only while they pulled the strings.
vote up1